Comments on: ORA-00001: unique constraint (METALINK.SYS_C005417) violated http://antognini.ch/2009/07/ora-00001-unique-constraint-metalinksys_c005417-violated/ Fri, 27 Jan 2012 07:31:12 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 By: Mette http://antognini.ch/2009/07/ora-00001-unique-constraint-metalinksys_c005417-violated/comment-page-1/#comment-3726 Mette Thu, 30 Jul 2009 10:21:50 +0000 http://antognini.ch/?p=412#comment-3726 Grin ... maybe they are having trouble FINDING the code produing the error - if the developers are not allowed access to prodcution environment definitions, it can be rather tedious to find a constraint with quite another name in test & dev environments. I HATE unnamed constraints ..... Grin … maybe they are having trouble FINDING the code produing the error – if the developers are not allowed access
to prodcution environment definitions, it can be rather tedious to find a constraint with quite another
name in test & dev environments. I HATE unnamed constraints …..

]]> By: Christian Antognini http://antognini.ch/2009/07/ora-00001-unique-constraint-metalinksys_c005417-violated/comment-page-1/#comment-3659 Christian Antognini Sun, 26 Jul 2009 08:25:41 +0000 http://antognini.ch/?p=412#comment-3659 Hi Gary I fully agree with you about the name of unique constraints. But, IMHO, the name of the constraints is much less important than the error handling... Cheers, Chris Hi Gary

I fully agree with you about the name of unique constraints. But, IMHO, the name of the constraints is much less important than the error handling…

Cheers,
Chris

]]> By: Gary http://antognini.ch/2009/07/ora-00001-unique-constraint-metalinksys_c005417-violated/comment-page-1/#comment-3655 Gary Sun, 26 Jul 2009 01:55:22 +0000 http://antognini.ch/?p=412#comment-3655 Forget the application, they should be giving their unique constraints some sort of reasonable name. Forget the application, they should be giving their unique constraints some sort of reasonable name.

]]>